International Financial Integration and Crisis Intensity

Andrew Rose

Macroeconomics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: This paper analyzes the causes of the 2008–2009 financial crisis together with its manifestations, using a Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause (MIMIC) model. The analysis is conducted on a cross-section of 85 economies; I focus on international financial linkages that may have both allowed the crisis to spread across economies, and/or provided insurance. The model of the cross-economy incidence of the crisis combines 2008–2009 changes in real gross domestic product (GDP), the stock market, economy credit ratings, and the exchange rate. The key domestic determinants of crisis incidence that I consider are taken from the literature, and are measured in 2006 : real GDP per capita; the degree of credit market regulation; and the current account, measured as a fraction of GDP. Above and beyond these three national sources of crisis vulnerability, I add a number of measures of both multilateral and bilateral financial linkages to investigate the effects of international financial integration on crisis incidence. I ask three questions, with a special focus on Asian economies. First, did the degree of an economy’s multilateral financial integration help explain its crisis? Second, what about the strength of its bilateral financial ties with the United States and the key Asian economics of the People’s Republic of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea? Third, did the presence of a bilateral swap line with the Federal Reserve affect the intensity of an economy’s crisis? I find that neither multilateral financial integration nor the existence of a Fed swap line is correlated with the cross-economy incidence of the crisis. There is mild evidence that economies with stronger bilateral financial ties to the United States (but not the large Asian economies) experienced milder crises. That is, more financially integrated economies do not seem to have suffered more during the most serious macroeconomic crisis in decades. This strengthens the case for international financial integration; if the costs of international financial integration were not great during the Great Recession, when could we ever expect them to be larger?

Keywords: financial integration; financial crisis; financial linkage; Asian economies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E65 F30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-mon
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/23195 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23195)

Related works:
Working Paper: International Financial Integration and Crisis Intensity (2012)
Working Paper: International Financial Integration and Crisis Intensity (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:macroe:23195

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Macroeconomics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().