The role of microeconomic policy reform in regional integration  analytical and empirical issues

Philippa Dee

EABER Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: Economic integration should not be an end in itself, but the outcome of domestic reforms that increase the general contestability of markets. The paper finds that for India, comprehensive domestic regulatory reform dominates as an integration strategy, while an ASEAN+6 PTA would fail to deliver gains. Multilateral action is an intermediate strategy, important for delivering trade liberalisation in sensitive sectors and in highly protected economies. The paper then considers what institutional approaches might facilitate further domestic structural reforms. Key to this are mechanisms to review the desirability and performance of all regulations and institutions on an ongoing basis, and in a way that involves all relevant stakeholders. Such policy review institutions can provide technical solutions, helping to identify particular reform options. They can also be part of a strategy to manage the domestic political economy of reform, by providing a forum in which countervailing interests could marshal against vested interests, thus helping to build a coalition in favour of reform. Finally, they can facilitate policy coordination within and across levels of government. The paper considers desirable characteristics of such institutions, and provides examples from around the Asian region.

Keywords: economic integration; preferential trade agreements; regulatory barriers to competition; domestic regulatory reform; Asia; institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/21793 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/21793)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:wpaper:21793

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EABER Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().