Combining Probability with Qualitative Degree-of-Certainty Metrics in Assessment
Richard Bradley and
Brian Hill ()
Additional contact information
Casey Helgeson: London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)
Richard Bradley: London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Philosophy
Brian Hill: HEC Paris - Economics & Decision Sciences; CNRS
No 1298, HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris
Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) employ an evolving framework of calibrated language for assessing and communicating degrees of certainty in findings. A persistent challenge for this framework has been ambiguity in the relationship between multiple degree-of-certainty metrics. We aim to clarify the relationship between the likelihood and confidence metrics used in the Fifth Assessment Report (2013), with benefits for mathematical consistency among multiple findings and for usability in downstream modeling and decision analysis. We discuss how our proposal meshes with current and proposed practice in IPCC uncertainty assessment.
Keywords: confidence; uncertainty reporting; climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3177022# Full text (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:heccah:1298
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris HEC Paris, 78351 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antoine Haldemann ().