Same Diversity, Different Impact: Decomposing Team Knowledge Diversity
Ankur Chavda and
John Eklund
Additional contact information
Ankur Chavda: HEC Paris - Strategy & Business Policy
John Eklund: University of Southern California - Management and Organization Department
No 1652, HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris
Abstract:
Research on innovation has long emphasized the benefits and challenges of knowledge diversity within inventor teams. However, prevailing conceptualizations of team knowledge diversity tend to aggregate knowledge across and within individuals, obscuring fundamentally different knowledge structures that may lead to teams recombining their knowledge in different ways. We address this limitation by decomposing team knowledge diversity into two theoretically distinct components. Compactness captures the extent to which team knowledge is concentrated within relatively specialized individuals. Commonality captures the extent to which team members possess a substantive and evenly distributed base of common knowledge. We theorize that these components create distinct opportunities and constraints for knowledge recombination and, consequently, invention outcomes. Using U.S. patent inventor teams and inventors’ prior experience across technological domains, we find that Compactness is negatively associated with invention impact, whereas Commonality is positively associated with impact, with the latter association substantially larger in magnitude. Commonality is also associated with inventions that are more closely connected to existing scientific knowledge, and narrower in technological scope. In contrast, Compactness is negatively associated with a variety of different invention outcomes. Our findings show that aggregate portrayals of team knowledge diversity can conceal consequential differences in how knowledge is structured within teams. By decomposing team knowledge diversity into attributes reflecting how knowledge is distributed within and across individuals, we integrate perspectives on individual knowledge specialization and team knowledge heterogeneity and provide a more granular account of how team knowledge structures shape knowledge recombination and inventive performance.
Keywords: knowledge recombination; knowledge diversity; inventor teams; specialization; patents; invention impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 O31 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2026-08-14
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7285441 Full text (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (https://ssrn.com/abstract=7285441 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=7285441 [302 Found]--> https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7285441)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:heccah:1652
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7285441
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris HEC Paris, 1 Rue de la Libération, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by David Melon ().