An Empirical Model for U.S. Foreign Aid Allocation
Mohamed Sraieb ()
Working Papers ECARES from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
This paper revisits the U.S. foreign aid drivers and addresses two shortcomingsin the literature on aid allocation. The first relates to the widespread use of staticmodels for aid allocation, despite of the general recognition that inertia may be akey determinant of donors’ decisions. The second, concerns the divergence betweenthe importance given to merit-based motivations for aid provision in donors’ officialdeclarations, on the one hand, and the poor measurement of such motivations inempirical studies, on the other hand. This paper combines a dynamic modeling thataccounts for inertia, a proper treatment of the sample selection problem, and mostimportantly, uses proxies for the merit-based motivations in the spirit of the “WashingtonConsensus” requirements. Next, the paper moves beyond existing studies bymeasuring the relative importance to the U.S. of need, merit-based, and self-interestmotivations. Furthermore, the analysis explores the link between the relative importanceof the motivation vectors and the geographic distribution of aid recipients.This allows to explain why conditionality, an integral part of most aid contracts, isnot enforced with the same rigor by the same donor when dealing with geographicallydifferent recipients.
Keywords: development aid; inertia; dynamic panel; aid motivations; merit-based motivation; recipient need; strategic interest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C30 F35 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 47 p.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/2214 ... AIEB-anempirical.pdf Full text for the whole work, or for a work part (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/221416
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/221416
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers ECARES from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().