Decoding Patent Examination Services

Lluís Gimeno Fabra and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potter ()

Working Papers ECARES from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles

Abstract: This paper puts forward a new methodology to characterize and compare the examination practice of most patent offices. The methodology codifies public information into a typology of chronological key examiner actions. This approach translates into a quantitative characterization of search completeness (i.e. classification and citation practices), certainty, speed, and stringency, or grant rate. The methodology is tested on a sample of 100 random families of a non-controversial field, comprising EPO, JPO and USPTO members. The results show profound differences across offices in respect to search completeness, certainty, and speed and indicate heterogeneous levels of stringency.

Pages: 25 p.
Date: 2017-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published by:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/2570 ... ENO-BVP-decoding.pdf Full text for the whole work, or for a work part (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Decoding patent examination services (2021)
Working Paper: Decoding patent examination services (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/257046

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/257046

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers ECARES from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().