Nelson-Siegel, affine and quadratic yield curve specifications: which one is better at forecasting?

Ken Nyholm and Rositsa Vidova-Koleva

No 1205, Working Paper Series from European Central Bank

Abstract: In this paper we compare the in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting performance of no-arbitrage quadratic and essentially affine term structure models, as well as the dynamic Nelson-Siegel model. In total eleven model variants are evaluated, comprising five quadratic, four affine and two Nelson-Siegel models. Recursive re-estimation and out-of-sample one-, six- and twelve-months ahead forecasts are generated and evaluated using monthly US data for yields observed at maturities of 1, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. Our results indicate that quadratic models provide the best in-sample fit, while the best out-of-sample performance is generated by three-factor affine models and the dynamic Nelson-Siegel model variants. However, statistical tests fail to identify one single-best forecasting model class. JEL Classification: C14, C15, G12

Keywords: affine term structure models; forecast performance; Nelson-Siegel model; quadratic yield curve models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-for
Note: 120728
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1205.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20101205

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from European Central Bank 60640 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Official Publications ().