A Utilitarian Welfare Analysis of Trade Liberalization

Robert Shelburne

No 2006_4, ECE Discussion Papers Series from UNECE

Abstract: This paper provides a welfare analysis of trade liberalization based upon the moral principles of utilitarianism. The history of the moral philosophy of utilitarianism is described including its introduction into what became known as Cambridge welfare economics. The differences between this school of thought and what would later develop as modern welfare analysis are discussed. Essentially, the Cambridge economists were not particularly disturbed by the assumptions of cardinal utility and interpersonal comparisons and argued that these assumptions added more than they took away. Next the mathematical form of a utilitarian utility and social welfare function are described and the values of the parameters are assigned based upon the writings of moral philosophers. Next the distributional consequences of trade liberalization are developed and the social welfare implications are derived. Basically it is concluded that trade policy changes produce large distributional changes relative to efficiency gains, and the gains go to individuals with significantly higher income than the lossers (in the developed economies). With a realistic concave utility function underlying the social welfare function, the benefits of trade liberalization are quite small if not negative. The policy implication is that trade liberalization without sizable redistribution is unlikely to actually (as opposed to potentially) increase social welfare. It is argued that this approach to trade policy analysis is much more useful in formulating trade policy than the current use of modern welfare- trade policy analysis commonly used and taught in most universities.

Keywords: Trade Policy; Utilitarian; Utilitarianism; Compensation principle; Welfare; interpersonal utility comparisons; utility function; income distribution; social welfare function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B20 D60 D63 F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2006-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in UNECE Discussion Paper Series, No. 2006_4

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/oes/disc_papers/ECE_DP_2006-4.pdf First version, 2004 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ece:dispap:2006_4

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ECE Discussion Papers Series from UNECE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Robert Shelburne ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).