Understanding the Inventory Cycle: I. Partial Equilibrium Analysis

Yi Wen

Working Papers from Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics

Abstract: Careful examination of aggregate data from the U.S. and other OECD countries reveals that production and inventory behavior exhibit paradoxical features: 1) Inventory investment is strongly countercyclical at very high frequencies (e.g., 2-3 quarters per cycle); it is procyclical only at relatively low cyclical frequencies such as the business-cycle frequencies (e.g., 8-40 quarters per cycle). 2) Production is less volatile than sales around the high frequencies; it is more volatile than sales only around business-cycle or lower frequencies. 3) Unlike capital investment or GDP, the bulk of the variance of inventory investment is concentrated around high frequencies rather than around business-cycle frequencies. These features of production and inventory behavior at the low and high frequencies provide a litmus test for inventory theories. This paper shows that the stockout-avoidance theory (Kahn, AER 1987) has a much better potential than any other competing theories for explaining the seemingly paradoxical features of inventory fluctuations observed at different cyclical frequencies. My analysis suggests that demand shocks are the source of the business cycle.

JEL-codes: E13 E22 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cae.economics.cornell.edu/caewp0308.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:corcae:03-08

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().