The Nature of Risk Preferences: Evidence from Insurance Choices
Ted O'Donoghue and
Working Papers from Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics
We use data on households' deductible choices in auto and home insurance to estimate a structural model of risky choice that incorporates "standard" risk aversion (concave utility over final wealth), loss aversion, and nonlinear probability weighting. Our estimates indicate that nonlinear probability weighting plays the most important role in explaining the data. More specifically, we find that standard risk aversion is small, loss aversion is nonexistent, and nonlinear probability weighting is large. When we estimate restricted models, we find that nonlinear probability weighting alone can better explain the data than standard risk aversion alone, loss aversion alone, and standard risk aversion and loss aversion combined. Our main findings are robust to a variety of modeling assumptions.
JEL-codes: D01 D03 D12 D81 G22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-ias, nep-mic and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: The Nature of Risk Preferences: Evidence from Insurance Choices (2013)
Working Paper: The Nature of Risk Preferences: Evidence from Insurance Choices (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:corcae:11-03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().