The Speech-ing of Sexual Harassment

Frederick Schauer
Additional contact information
Frederick Schauer: Harvard U

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Although a great deal of sexual harassment takes place without words, even more of it does not. Whether it be the words that are used to make the kind of "quid pro quo" proposition that characterizes the classic if-you-sleep-with-me-you-will-not-get fired form of sexual harassment, or the catcalls and other words of taunting that create the archetypal hostile environment, a vast amount of what uncontroversially counts as sexual harassment under the law takes place through the use of what would be called "speech" in the ordinary, non-technical, non-legal, non-First-Amendment sense of that word. Traditionally, sexual harassment using words was treated as sexual harassment and not the kind of speech with which the First Amendment was concerned. More recently, however, what had previously been treated as pure sexual harassment has been sociologically tranformed into the kind of speech that implicates the First Amendment, and this paper explores the way in which the transformation has occurred, and the consequences of the transformation.

Date: 2000-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp00-012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().