Are Banks Liquidity Transformers?

Akash Deep and Guido Schaefer
Additional contact information
Akash Deep: Harvard U
Guido Schaefer: Vienna U of Economics and Business Administration

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Although much of banking theory and regulation is based on banks modeled as fragile liquidity transformers, this view does not appear to have solid empirical foundation. We show that the amount of liquidity transformation measured as the scaled difference between liquid liabilities and assets performed by US commercial banks is surprisingly low. Deposit insurance has limited success in promoting liquidity transformation because insured deposits mostly replace uninsured liabilities rather than expand the deposit base or loans. Instead, it is the credit risk in loan portfolios that appears to discourage liquidity transformation.

Date: 2004-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34)

Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=457

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp04-022

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().