The Management Performance of the U.S. States

David King, Richard Zeckhauser and Mark Kim
Additional contact information
David King: Harvard U
Mark Kim: Harvard U

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: The Maxwell School's Government Performance Project rated the management successes of the 50 states in several areas, such as capital management, human resources and information technology in 1998 and 2000. Variability among the states was significant. Viewing the Maxwell School data as something to be explained, we focus on political institutions, social characteristics and the economic environments in the states. We review hypotheses that predict management performance, and we test them empirically. We find that states high in social capital, states with professional legislatures, and states with vibrant entrepreneurial economies are more likely to be better managed. A state’s tax burden and the governor’s powers seem unrelated to the Maxwell School scores. States with a high density of “good government” groups tend to be poor performers, presumably because citizens join such groups hoping to improve their unsatisfactory state governments. Please note: The larger study that this paper discusses will be published in a book by The Brookings Institution in early 2005.

Date: 2004-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=128

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp04-028

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (workingpapers@econlit.org).