The Methodology of Positive Policy Analysis

Christopher Robert and Richard Zeckhauser
Additional contact information
Christopher Robert: Harvard University

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Policy analyses frequently clash. Their disagreements stem from many sources, such as models, empirical estimates, values, who should have standing, and weighting of different criteria. We provide a simple taxonomy of disagreement, identifying distinct categories within both the positive and value domains. Using disagreements in climate policy to illustrate, we demonstrate how illuminating the structure of disagreement can help to clarify the way forward. We conclude by suggesting a structure for new policy analysis that can facilitate assessment, comparison, and debate by making clear the likely sources of disagreement.

Date: 2010-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/work ... ?PubId=7424&type=WPN

Related works:
Working Paper: The Methodology of Positive Policy Analysis (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp10-041

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().