EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark

Raj Chetty, John Friedman, Soren Leth-Peterson, Torben Nielsen () and Tore Olsen
Additional contact information
Soren Leth-Peterson: University of Copenhagen
Tore Olsen: University of Copenhagen

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Do retirement savings policies--such as tax subsidies or employer-provided pension plans--increase total saving for retirement or simply induce shifting across accounts? We revisit this classic question using 45 million observations on wealth for the population of Denmark. We find that a policy's impact on wealth accumulation depends on whether it changes savings rates by active or passive choice. Tax subsidies, which rely upon individuals to take an action to raise savings, have small impacts on total wealth. We estimate that each $1 of tax expenditure on subsidies increases total saving by 1 cent. In contrast, policies that raise retirement contributions if individuals take no action--such as automatic employer contributions to retirement accounts--increase wealth accumulation substantially. Price subsidies only affect the behavior of active savers who respond to incentives, whereas automatic contributions increase the savings of passive individuals who do not reoptimize. We estimate that approximately 85% of individuals are passive savers. The 15% of active savers who respond to price subsidies do so primarily by shifting assets across accounts rather than reducing consumption. These individuals are also more likely to offset changes in automatic contributions and have higher wealth-income ratios. We conclude that automatic contributions are more effective at increasing savings rates than price subsidies for three reasons: (1) subsidies induce relatively few individuals to respond, (2) they generate substantial crowd-out conditional on response, and (3) they do not influence the savings behavior of passive individuals, who are least prepared for retirement.

Date: 2013-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age, nep-dem and nep-eec
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/work ... ?PubId=8742&type=WPN

Related works:
Journal Article: Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowdout in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp13-002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp13-002