"I Won't Back Down?": Complexity and Courage in U.S. Federal Executive Decision-Making

Steven Kelman, Ronald Sanders, Gayatri Pandit and Sarah Taylor
Additional contact information
Steven Kelman: Harvard University
Ronald Sanders: Booz Allen Hamilton
Gayatri Pandit: Booz Allen Hamilton
Sarah Taylor: Booz Allen Hamilton

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Senior government executives make many decisions, not-infrequently difficult ones. Cognitive limitations and biases preclude individuals from making fully value-maximizing choices. And the "groupthink" tradition has highlighted ways group-aided decision-making can fail to live up to its potential. Out of this literature has emerged a prescriptive paradigm Janis calls "vigilant decision-making" For this paper, we interviewed twenty heads of subcabinet-level organizations in the U.S. federal government, asking each questions about how they made important decisions. Ten were nominated by "good-government" experts as ones doing an outstanding job improving the organization's performance, ten chosen at random. The vigilant decision-making approach is designed for difficult decisions, presumed to be informationally, technically, or politically complex. However, we found that when we asked these executives to discuss their most difficult decision, most identified decisions that were not informationally complex but instead mainly required courage to make. In this context, the vigilant decision-making paradigm might be more problematic than the literature suggests. We discuss here the different demands for decisions involving complexity and those involving courage, and suggest a contingency model of good decision-making processes that requires executives and advisors to be ambidextrous in their approaches.

Date: 2014-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/work ... ?PubId=9464&type=WPN

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp14-040

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().