Searching for the Devil in the Details: Learning about Development Program Design

Sara Nadel and Lant Pritchett
Additional contact information
Sara Nadel: Harvard University

Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: Motivated by our experience in designing a particular social program, skill set signaling for new entrants to the labor market in Peru, we articulate the need for, and explore the empirical consequences of, alternative learning approaches to the design of development projects. Using a simulation, we demonstrate that even with only modest dimensioned design space and even modest "ruggedness" of the outcome with respect to design a naive iterative approach of "crawling the design space" dominates an RCT learning strategy. We suggest that the empirical results of RCTs to date are consistent with social programs having high dimensional design space and outcomes sensitive to design and hence project/program/policy design must depend on more robust learning strategies than the attempt to directly apply results from "systematic reviews" or move prematurely to an RCT.

JEL-codes: C93 D04 O12 O22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1443

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp16-041

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().