Policy Intervention in Debt Renegotiation: Evidence from the Home Affordable Modification Program

Sumit Agarwal, Gene Amromin, Itzhak Ben-David, Souphala Chomsisengphet, Tomasz Piskorski and Amit Seru
Additional contact information
Souphala Chomsisengphet: US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Tomasz Piskorski: Columbia University

Working Paper Series from Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics

Abstract: The main rationale for policy intervention in debt renegotiation is to enhance such activity when foreclosures are perceived to be inefficiently high. We examine the ability of the government to influence debt renegotiation by empirically evaluating the effects of the 2009 Home Affordable Modification Program that provided intermediaries (servicers) with sizeable financial incentives to renegotiate mortgages. A difference-in-difference strategy that exploits variation in program eligibility criteria reveals that the program generated an increase in the intensity of renegotiations while adversely affecting effectiveness of renegotiations performed outside the program. Renegotiations induced by the program resulted in a modest reduction in rate of foreclosures but did not alter the rate of house price decline, durable consumption, or employment in regions with higher exposure to the program. The overall impact of the program will be substantially limited since it will induce renegotiations that will reach just one-third of its targeted 3 to 4 million indebted households. This shortfall is in large part due to low renegotiation intensity of a few large servicers that responded at half the rate than others. The muted response of these servicers cannot be accounted by differences in contract, borrower, or regional characteristics of mortgages across servicers. Instead, their low renegotiation activity--which is also observed before the program--reflects servicer specific factors that appear to be related to their preexisting organizational capabilities. Our findings reveal that the ability of government to quickly induce changes in behavior of large intermediaries through financial incentives is quite limited, underscoring significant barriers to the effectiveness of such polices.

JEL-codes: E60 E65 G18 G21 H30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac, nep-sea and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (36)

Downloads: (external link)
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2138314

Related works:
Journal Article: Policy Intervention in Debt Renegotiation: Evidence from the Home Affordable Modification Program (2017)
Working Paper: Policy Intervention in Debt Renegotiation: Evidence from the Home Affordable Modification Program (2016)
Working Paper: Policy Intervention in Debt Renegotiation: Evidence from the Home Affordable Modification Program (2013)
Working Paper: Policy Intervention in Debt Renegotiation: Evidence from the Home Affordable Modification Program (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:ohidic:2012-20

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().