Does Greater Public Scrutiny Hurt a Firm's Performance?

Benjamin Bennett, Rene M. Stulz and Zexi Wang
Additional contact information
Benjamin Bennett: Tulane U
Rene M. Stulz: Ohio State U and ECGI, Brussels
Zexi Wang: Lancaster U

Working Paper Series from Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics

Abstract: Public attention to a firm may provide valuable monitoring, but it may also have a dark side by constraining management's decisions and distracting it. We use inclusion in the S&P 500 index as a positive shock to public attention. Media coverage, Google searches, SEC downloads, SEC comment letters, shareholder proposals, analyst coverage, and lawsuits increase following inclusion. Post-inclusion performance falls and is negatively related to the increase in attention. Included firms' investment and payout policies become more similar to those of index peers and the increase in similarity is positively related to the size of the attention increase.

JEL-codes: G24 G31 G32 G35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4321191

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:ohidic:2023-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().