Defining the Minimum Winning Game in High-Technology Ventures
Robert A. Burgelman and
Robert E. Siegel
Additional contact information
Robert A. Burgelman: Stanford U
Robert E. Siegel: General Electric Company
Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business
Abstract:
Based on a combination of exploratory field research and executive experience, we propose that defining the "Minimum Winning Game" (WMG) is a difficult yet critical responsibility of top management to keep a high-technology venture focused and able to learn from its ongoing efforts in the face of rapidly evolving technological and market uncertainties. We also propose that achieving the MWG requires the intelligent balancing of three "key drivers of strategic action": technology development, product development, and strategy development. Finally, we propose that instilling the discipline necessary to define the MWG and balance the drivers of strategic action is facilitated by the use of a strategy-making process informed by key data gathering and analysis tools such as the market requirement document (MRD) and the product requirement document (PRD).
Date: 2006-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1958.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to gsbapps.stanford.edu:443 (certificate verify failed) (http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1958.pdf [302 Found]--> https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1958.pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:1958
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (workingpapers@econlit.org).