EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Toward an Ecology of Market Categories

Elizabeth G. Pontikes and Michael T. Hannan
Additional contact information
Elizabeth G. Pontikes: University of Chicago
Michael T. Hannan: Stanford University

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: This paper proposes that social categorization is driven by an ecological dynamic that operates in two planes: feature space and category space. It develops a theoretical model that links positions in feature space to label assignments in category space. The first part of the model predicts that movements in feature space affect label assignments in category space, with proximity to labeled clusters affecting label adoption. The second part predicts that the structure of category space affects this relationship. For lenient labels, positions in feature space are more weakly related to label adoption in category space. An empirical analysis of software producers, based on their positions in a feature space of patents, and a category space of market-label affiliations, supports these predictions. The results imply that social classification is characterized by this coupled ecological dynamic. Further, our findings have implications for the evolution of categories, suggesting that lenient categories will become more lenient, while constraining categories will become more constraining.

Date: 2012-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2110.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 400 Bad Request (https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2110.pdf [302 Found]--> https://login.stanford.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/Redirect/SSO?SAMLRequest=fZLLbsIwEEV%2FJfKeOA9CqUUipbAoEi2I0C66qZx4IJYcO%2FU4ffx9A6EqbFj7zpm5R54hb1TL8s7VegsfHaDzvhulkZ0eUtJZzQxHiUzzBpC5ihX504pFfsBaa5ypjCJejgjWSaPnRmPXgC3AfsoKXrarlNTOtcgoPWDJ2xZ9dFzvjRU%2BiI4WtSxLo8DVPqKhR3ZEN%2BtiR7xFf4zU%2FIj9hyhzkPoaIUVL%2B1P2UsF5fgtCWqgcLYo18ZaLlLxP76u4igKIglAkSRSF9zGf3PGJEBMQ0xj6GGIHS31Eu5REQZSMgvEoiHfhmCUhi8dvxNucGz9ILaQ%2B3NZTDiFkj7vdZjR0egWLpz59gGSzo2R2WmwvtN%2FG8j%2FXJLtpdkYv6MOqlj33uOViY5SsfrxcKfM1t8AdpCQkNBtGrr9D9gs%3D&RelayState=ss%3Amem%3A60fa7f7444e07cf743b89cddc95060997402d5fe2730e7b489d0740d25e5be22)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:2110

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-07
Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:2110