Getting the Most out of Giving: Pursuing Concretely-Framed Prosocial Goals Maximizes Happiness

Melanie Rudd, Jennifer Aaker and Michael I. Norton
Additional contact information
Melanie Rudd: Stanford University
Jennifer Aaker: Stanford University
Michael I. Norton: Harvard University

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: Across six field and laboratory experiments, participants given a concretely-framed prosocial goal (e.g., making someone smile, increasing recycling) felt happier after performing a goal-directed act of kindness than did those who were assigned a functionally similar, but more abstractly-framed, prosocial goal (e.g., making someone happy, saving the environment). This effect was driven by differences in the size of the gap between participants' expectations and reality: Compared to those assigned to pursue an abstractly-framed prosocial goal, those assigned to pursue a concretely-framed goal perceived that the actual outcome of their goal-directed efforts more accurately matched their expectations, causing them to experience a greater boost in personal happiness. Further, participants were unable to predict this effect, believing that pursuing abstractly-framed prosocial goals would have either an equal or greater positive impact on their own happiness.

Date: 2013-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-hap
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2129.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 400 Bad Request (https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2129.pdf [302 Found]--> https://login.stanford.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/Redirect/SSO?SAMLRequest=fZLLbsIwEEV%2FJfI%2BOA8SwCJIFBZFogUR2kU3lZMMYMmxXY%2FT0r9vArSFDWvfOXfmyGPktTRs2riD2sBHA%2Bi8Yy0VstNDRhqrmOYokCleAzJXsnz6tGRRL2DGaqdLLYk3RQTrhFYzrbCpweZgP0UJL5tlRg7OGWSU7rHgxmAPHVc7baseVA3ND6IotAR36CFq2rEjul7lW%2BLN22WE4h32HyL1XqhbhKgMbVfZCQmX%2BQ1UwkLpaJ6viLeYZ%2BS9n6TxIEj6MSThjif9IopGYZrG%2FXQ4SMqItzHEBhaqQ7uMREGU%2BmHoB8NtMGLJiMXxG%2FHWl4sfhKqE2t%2FXU5xDyB6327V%2FvukVLJ7uaQNkMu4ks1OxvdJ%2BH8t%2FXZPJlVlfHn0DqH1jq%2FDWD%2F4pHtOrwnO7Yc9tw2K%2B1lKU395USv01s8AdZCQkdHIeuf0hkx8%3D&RelayState=ss%3Amem%3A8d4074ea147ef1a44e57eec1c164ed8776a57e38847664e4259988a76dd84cb1)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:2129

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().