Getting the Most out of Giving: Pursuing Concretely-Framed Prosocial Goals Maximizes Happiness

Melanie Rudd, Jennifer Aaker and Michael I. Norton
Additional contact information
Melanie Rudd: Stanford University
Jennifer Aaker: Stanford University
Michael I. Norton: Harvard University

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: Across six field and laboratory experiments, participants given a concretely-framed prosocial goal (e.g., making someone smile, increasing recycling) felt happier after performing a goal-directed act of kindness than did those who were assigned a functionally similar, but more abstractly-framed, prosocial goal (e.g., making someone happy, saving the environment). This effect was driven by differences in the size of the gap between participants' expectations and reality: Compared to those assigned to pursue an abstractly-framed prosocial goal, those assigned to pursue a concretely-framed goal perceived that the actual outcome of their goal-directed efforts more accurately matched their expectations, causing them to experience a greater boost in personal happiness. Further, participants were unable to predict this effect, believing that pursuing abstractly-framed prosocial goals would have either an equal or greater positive impact on their own happiness.

Date: 2013-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-hap
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2129.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 400 Bad Request (https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2129.pdf [302 Found]--> https://login.stanford.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/Redirect/SSO?SAMLRequest=fZLLbsIwEEV%2FJfI%2BOJgCjUUiUVgUiZaI0C66qZx4AEvGdj1OS%2F%2B%2B4dEWNqx959yZI49Q7LTj4yZszRI%2BGsAQ7XfaID8%2BZKTxhluBCrkRO0Aeal6On%2BacdRLuvA22tppEY0TwQVkzsQabHfgS%2FKeq4WU5z8g2BIec0g1WwjnsYBBmbb3sgGxouVVVZTWEbQfR0gOb0WJRrkg0bZdRRhyw%2FxBtN8pcI5R0tF1lrTSc55cglYc60LJckGg2zch7t1dJlqbrdV8M6mGf1XKQ1lKIHhvc9XvDpI0hNjAzB3TICEvYIE7SOLlfdROepLzP3khUnC9%2BUEYqs7mtpzqFkD%2BuVkV8uukVPB7vaQMkHx0k82Oxv9B%2BGyt%2BXZP8wmys97EDtLHzkl37wT%2FFI3pReGp3%2FLltmE0Lq1X9HY21tl8TDyJARrqE5qeR6x%2BS%2FwA%3D&RelayState=ss%3Amem%3A55f157f239463532778c66b76b4739d7905e4750bb601a6ffbd044f04220233a)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:2129

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().