Enabling Mini-grid Development in Rural India

Stephen D. Comello, Stefan J. Reichelstein, Anshuman Sahoo and Tobias S. Schmidt
Additional contact information
Stephen D. Comello: Stanford University
Stefan J. Reichelstein: Stanford University
Anshuman Sahoo: Stanford University
Tobias S. Schmidt: ETH Zurich

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: Rural electrification rates in India lag behind government goals, in part due to the inability of distribution companies (discoms) to fund central grid expansion. In the absence of central grid electrification, mini-grids offer significant potential for an immediate pathway towards rural electrification and the attendant gains in economic growth and productivity. Yet private investment in mini-grids has been virtually absent in India. Using a comprehensive lifecycle cost analysis, we find that mini-grids based on solar PV power and storage are more economical than incumbent energy services available to households without central grid connection. Under current law, a prospective entrepreneur in India does not require a license or certification in order to build a mini-grid and subsequently provide electricity services in the area covered by said installation. Conversely, there is no legal or regulatory framework that specifies what is to happen if the central grid were to be extended to an area that is already covered by a mini-grid. We report detailed survey evidence from interviews with entrepreneurs, analysts and policymakers whose assessments converge on the same point: mini-grid investments would be jeopardized in the event of central grid extension, precisely because discoms would, by regulatory order, provide electricity services at highly subsidized rates, well below their full economic cost. Our fieldwork suggests that the threat of central grid extension is the gateway barrier preventing mini-grid development in India. The issues associated with the gateway barrier have common elements with the so-called holdup problem as identified in the economics of organizations. There have been two recent federal policy guidelines and one actual-state level policy addressing the regulatory status of mini-grids. We examine the effectiveness of these policies/proposals in terms of an entrepreneur's ability to develop mini-grids in the future.

Date: 2016-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/408256
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/408256 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/408256)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:3382

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().