Overconfidence and Occupational Choice

Edward Lazear

Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: A statistical theory of overconfidence is proposed and applied to the issue of occupational choice. Individuals who can choose whether to engage in an activity or not must estimate their performance. The estimates have error and that error has positive expectation among those who engage in the activity. As a result, an unbiased ex ante estimate of performance in an occupatoin results in an ex post biased estimate of ability among those enter. The statistical theory of overconfidence provides a number of testable implications, most significant of which is that overconfidence should be more prevalent in occupations where estimates of ability are noisier. This and other implications are tested and found to hold using the Current Population Survey and Panel Study of Income Dynamics data.

Date: 2016-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/416231
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/416231 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/416231)

Related works:
Working Paper: Overconfidence and Occupational Choice (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:3419

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().