 Egalitarian Effort: How Cultural Scrutiny Produces Gendered Hiring in Professional SalesAdina Sterling and
Natasha Overmeyer
Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Abstract: Egalitarianism has taken hold ideologically in many countries and has increased women's entry into white-collar professional fields, but gendered access to professions persists. In this article the authors suggest managers' cultural scrutiny--a practice whereby institutional actors cultivate and use personal information infused with cultural cues in the hiring process, paradoxically both enables adherence to egalitarianism and gendered access to white-collar jobs. Using NLP techniques and data from nearly 20,000 applicants to a professional entry-level sales position in three large urban centers in the U.S., the authors find evidence that through cultural scrutiny, institutional actors decouple candidate gender from sex to advantage candidates with masculine characteristics in the hiring process over candidates with feminine characteristics, as well as female applicants over male applicants. The authors situate cultural scrutiny in a broader cultural hiring frame--i.e. traditional essentialism, egalitarian essentialism, and symbolic egalitarianism--and discuss how cultural scrutiny affects gender inequality in institutions, labor markets and work organizations. Date: 2021 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:3937 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.