Off with their heads: Terrorism and electoral support for capital punishment in Australia

Tim Fry, Clare Felvus, Sinclair Davidson and Lisa Farrell ()

No 174, Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings from Econometric Society

Abstract: Recent terrorist attacks such as the attacks on the World Trade Centre in September 2001 have generated new interest in the debate on capital punishment. It has been suggested that support for the death penalty could be higher in the wake of terrorist activity. Using data from the Australian Election Study we investigate voters' attitudes towards capital punishment. Paradoxically, overall support for the death penalty at the 2001 Federal election was lower than at previous elections. In this paper we utilise both simultaneous binary probit and treatment effects models to model the determinants of those attitudes and to investigate the impact of terrorism on support for the death penalty at the 2001 Federal election. In particular, we address the question of whether voters who felt terrorism was an important issue had higher levels of support for the death penalty than voters who did not feel that terrorism was important

Keywords: simultaneous binary probit; treatment effects models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C35 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-08-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.org/esAUSM04/up.16707.1077760936.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:ausm04:174

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().