Vertical Control and Horizontal Coordination in Dynamic Oligopoly Pricing: Empirical Evidence from a Natural Supergame Experiment in Gasoline Markets

Zhongmin Wang

No 42, Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings from Econometric Society

Abstract: This paper examines empirically the players’ intrabrand vertical price control, interbrand horizontal pricing coordination, and their learning process to equilibrium in a rare natural experiment of supergame where a well defined simultaneous-move price setting stage game is repeated every 24 hours. The experiment occurred in Western Australia where a state law forces all gasoline service stations to report to the government, by 2:00 pm each day, their next-day retail prices. With a dataset that includes the daily price of virtually every retail outlet in a metropolitan area for 34 months, this paper shows that various forms of vertical price restraints are used by the upstream firms to control and synchronize intrabrand price, price leadership and short-term commitment are used to enable the upstream firms to effectively set prices sequentially, and punishment of short-duration and trial-and-error are used to get onto the nonsynchronization equilibrium

Keywords: vertical restraint; horizontal coordination; price leadership; dynamic game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L13 L16 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-08-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:ausm04:42

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().