An Empirical Test of Industrial Targeting
No 794, Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings from Econometric Society
This paper first show that South Korea's industrial targeting in the name of heavy and chemical industry drive in the 1970s managed to produce industries with international competitiveness over time. It then performs ex post cost-benefit analysis to show that industrial targeting in Korea has failed to pay off. One reason is that targeted industries grow fast during their long infancy period but growth slows down after they mature. Another reason is that the cost incurred during the infancy period consists of a large margin of protection and subsidy while the benefit reaped after maturation is composed only of excess profitability. The results suggest that an eclectic view is needed in interpreting the 'East Asian Miracle.'
Keywords: industrial policy; infant industry; targeting; cost-benefit analysis; protection; subsidy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O19 F13 L52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:feam04:794
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().