Is Government Ownership of Banks Really Harmful to Growth?
Svetlana Andrianova (),
Panicos Demetriades () and
Anja Shortland ()
CEDI Discussion Paper Series from Centre for Economic Development and Institutions(CEDI), Brunel University
We show that previous results suggesting that government ownership of banks has a negative effect on economic growth are not robust to adding more 'fundamental' determinants of economic grwoth, such as institutions. We also present regression results from a more recent period (1995-2007) which suggest that, if anything, government ownership of banks has been associated with higher long run growth rates, even after controlling for institutions and other variables suggested by the growth literature. Drawing on the current global financial crisis, we provide a conceptual framework which explains why under certain circumstances government owned banks could have a greater effect on economic growth than privately-owned banks.
Pages: 17 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban and nep-fdg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Is Government Ownership of Banks Really Harmful to Growth? (2010)
Working Paper: Is Government Ownership of Banks Really Harmful to Growth? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edb:cedidp:09-05
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEDI Discussion Paper Series from Centre for Economic Development and Institutions(CEDI), Brunel University CEDI, Brunel University,West London,UB8 3PH,United Kingdom. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarmistha Pal (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .