Silk Roads of the Twenty-first Century: The Cultural Dimension
Rosita Dellios
Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies from Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University
Abstract:
Much has been written about China's grand project of the twenty-first century, the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road—or the Belt and Road Initiative. It is set to lift living standards through the provision of infrastructure and better connectivity where these are lacking. While economic resources are enumerated, and the maps of roads and corridors have been drafted, the cultural dimension is understudied. Beijing has not helped in this regard. Apart from vague slogans like ‘win–win cooperation’, ‘mutual respect’ and ‘community of common destiny’, there has been no concerted effort to showcase China's thought culture that is eminently suited to precisely this type of venture. If collaboration, even more than connectivity, is the necessary glue for bringing the regions of the Belt and Road together, then China needs to heed the advice of its own great philosophers.
Keywords: silk roads; Belt and Road Initiative; Chinese philosophy; China's foreign policy; Bandung spirit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tre
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Published in Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, May 2017, pages
Downloads: (external link)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/app5.172/full (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:een:appswp:201716
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies from Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sung Lee ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).