China's hegemonic intentions and trajectory: Will it opt for benevolent, coercive, or Dutch-style hegemony?

Lukas K. Danner and Félix E. Martín

Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies from Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University

Abstract: China's unprecedented economic growth led some scholars to conclude that it will replace the United States as the future global hegemon. However, China's intentions in exercising future global leadership are yet unknown and difficult to extrapolate from its often contradictory behaviour. A preliminary overview of China's island building in the South China Sea reveals its potentially coercive intentions. This inference is consistent with the analysis of those who prognosticate China's violent rise. Conversely and simultaneously, China's participation in peacekeeping operations and its global investments evince its benevolent hegemonic intentions, which are congruent with the argument of those who predict China's peaceful hegemonic ascent. Confronted with these divergent tendencies in China's recent international relations, and assuming its continued rise, it is, thus, essential to examine China's strategic intentions and how these may ultimately project its violent or peaceful hegemonic rise. This article argues that the “Third Way†or “Dutch†style†hegemony is highly instructive in this context and, thus, should be examined and added to the existing debate on China's rise as either a benevolent or coercive hegemon. We argue that Dutch†style hegemony may be the most viable way for China to proceed in its global hegemonic ascendancy.

Keywords: benevolent hegemon; China; coercive hegemon; Dutch-style hegemon; intentions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2019-06-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, May 2019, pages 186-207

Downloads: (external link)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.273 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:een:appswp:201911

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies from Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sung Lee ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).