Tree Planting Decisions Under Conditions of Irreversibility And Imperfect Labor Markets

Asa Jose U. Sajise
Additional contact information
Asa Jose U. Sajise: Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics Giannini Hall, U.C. Berkeley

No tp200301t1, EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper from Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA)

Abstract: This study is based on two observations about farmers' decisions to plant trees. The first is that it takes more labor to cut or uproot trees than to plant them. The second, is that rural labor markets are riddled with imperfections that make it difficult to hire labor for farm management so households tend to rely on family labor. The combination of these two factors may lead to a situation of economic irreversibility. This eventually locks land to trees. Farm households lose their ability to cope with risk ex-post because they have less flexible farming systems. The premise of this study is that households take these factors into account when choosing the rate, timing, and scale by which they plant trees. To verify this premise, a general model of natural resource accumulation under uncertainty and economic irreversibility was constructed. This model is a discrete time version of the common Dixit and Pindyck model. Stylized assumptions were used to conduct a numerical analysis. The objective of the numerical simulation is to derive general theoretical results and propositions about how economic irreversibility affects tree-planting decisions. Results of the analysis indicate that labor market imperfections lead to a lower volatility in the wage process. As seen from the stylized numerical simulation, this leads to earlier planting. Therefore, contrary to the findings of the standard model of exogenous irreversibility, the possibility of delayed timing is not true for economic irreversibility. The scale effects of irreversibility are also clearly seen from the analysis. Labor deficit or more labor-constrained households tend to plant early but will plant fewer trees per hectare. Numerical simulations showed that labor deficit households would plant faster compared to labor deficit households under economic irreversibility. It was also found that demographic variables (e.g. family size) affected the wage process and, therefore, the results can be attributed partly to these variables. Finally, the policy implication of this study is discussed. To be effective, agroforestry programs in the uplands must recognize heterogeneity of upland populations. As a consequence, the project rather than program approach is more appropriate when introducing upland interventions. These interventions must strongly consider the demographic characteristics and the position of the farming households in the labor market.

Keywords: tree planting; labor market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-01, Revised 2003-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eepsea.org/pub/tr/2003_Sajise.pdf First version, 2003 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.eepsea.org/pub/tr/2003_Sajise.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eepsea.org/pub/tr/2003_Sajise.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://eepsea.org/pub/tr/2003_Sajise.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp200301t1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper from Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Arief Anshory yusuf ().