Inter-Sectoral Terms of Trade and Investible Surplus
Mohsen Fardmanesh ()
Additional contact information
Mohsen Fardmanesh: Temple University
No 1060, Working Papers from Economic Growth Center, Yale University
Abstract:
This paper studies the validity of the Preobrazhensky’s First Proposition, P1, for the centrally planned Poland during the period of 1960-1987 by testing whether the state increased its internal accumulation, investible surplus, by reducing the inter-sectoral terms of trade between agriculture and industry. It uses an alternative bivariate approach with pair-wise cointegration and Granger causality analysis. While finding some support for P1 in Poland, it reveals that the existing multivariate empirical approach derived from the Sah-Stiglitz’s market-based theoretical model of the ‘price scissors’ problem can misrepresent not only the validity of P1 in a centrally planned economy but also the impact of the intrinsic determinants of the state’s investible surplus such as the production capacities in agriculture and industry.
Keywords: Price Scissors; Internal Accumulation; Investible Surplus; Inter-sectoral Terms of Trade; Central Planning; Poland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O2 P2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2017-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://egcenter.economics.yale.edu/sites/default/ ... -cdp1100/cdp1060.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:egc:wpaper:1060
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Economic Growth Center, Yale University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benjamin King ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).