Not too close, not too far: testing the Goldilocks principle of ‘optimal’ distance in innovation networks
Rune Fitjar (),
Franz Huber and
Andrés Rodríguez-Pose ()
No 1609, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography
This paper analyses how the formation of collaboration networks affects firm-level innovation by applying the ‘Goldilocks principle’. The ‘Goldilocks principle’ of optimal distance in innovation networks postulates that the best firm-level innovation results are achieved when the partners involved in the network are located at the ‘right’ distance, i.e. ‘not too close and not too far’ from one another, across non-geographical proximity dimensions. This principle is tested on a survey of 542 Norwegian firms conducted in 2013, containing information about firm-level innovation activities and key innovation partners. The results of the ordinal logit regression analysis substantiate the Goldilocks principle, as the most innovative firms are found amongst those that collaborate with partners at medium levels of proximity for all non-geographical dimensions. The analysis also underscores the importance of the presence of a substitution-innovation mechanism, with geographical distance problems being compensated by proximity in other dimensions as a driver of innovation, whilst there is no support for a potential overlap-innovation mechanism.
Keywords: Proximities; innovation; networks; collaboration; Goldilocks principle; Norway (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O31 O33 D85 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-cse, nep-geo, nep-ino, nep-net, nep-pke, nep-sbm, nep-tid and nep-ure
Date: 2016-05, Revised 2016-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg1609.pdf Version May 2016 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Not too close, not too far: testing the Goldilocks principle of ‘optimal’ distance in innovation networks (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:egu:wpaper:1609
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().