Regional diversification and green employment in US Metropolitan Areas
Nicolò Barbieri () and
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Davide Consoli ()
No 1727, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography
This paper analyses whether and to what extent regional diversification enables or thwarts green employment in US Metropolitan Areas (MAs) between 2006 and 2014. The recent debate on related and unrelated variety provides the conceptual frame for our study. The main findings are two. First, unrelated diversification is a positive and significant predictor of green employment growth. Second, this effect differs across occupational categories: while unrelated variety at industry level favours the growth of mid- to low-skill green jobs, unrelated variety at occupational level favours high- to mid-skill green jobs. Overall, local related diversification has very little impact.
Keywords: Green employment; Variety; Diversifications (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-geo, nep-tid and nep-ure
Date: 2017-10, Revised 2017-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg1727.pdf Version October 2017 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Regional diversification and green employment in US metropolitan areas (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:egu:wpaper:1727
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .