EU trade and non-trade objectives: new survey evidence on policy design and effectiveness
Aydin Yildirim,
Robert Basedow,
Matteo Fiorini and
Bernard Hoekman
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library
Abstract:
EU trade policy increasingly focuses on the achievement of non-trade policy objectives (NTPOs) such as the promotion of human rights or environmental protection, motivating research on the political economy determinants and effectiveness of linking trade policy and NTPOs. This research reports selected findings from a new expert survey of stakeholder perceptions of trade–NTPO linkages. These suggest that the views of EU institutions align with those of civil society organizations more than with business, but also reveal significant differences in the perceived effectiveness of trade–NTPO linkage strategies. Many stakeholder groups believe that policy instruments other than trade agreements are more effective tools to pursue NTPOs. These findings suggest that further research on EU trade policy and non-trade issues should consider the broader range of external policy tools available to the EU in pursuit of NTPOs and the determinants of differences in preferences for alternative policy instruments.
Keywords: EU trade policy; non-trade objectives; trade agreements; expert survey; issue linkage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2020-05-13
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in Journal of Common Market Studies, 13, May, 2020. ISSN: 0021-9886
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/105159/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: EU Trade and Non‐trade Objectives: New Survey Evidence on Policy Design and Effectiveness (2021) 
Working Paper: EU Trade and Non-Trade Objectives: New Survey Evidence on Policy Design and Effectiveness (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:105159
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().