How Africans shaped British colonial institutions: evidence from local taxation
Jutta Bolt and
Leigh Gardner
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library
Abstract:
The institutions that governed most of the rural population in British colonial Africa have been neglected in the literature on colonialism. We use new data on local governments, or "Native Authorities,"to present the first quantitative comparison of African institutions under indirect rule in four colonies in 1948: Nigeria, the Gold Coast, Nyasaland, and Kenya. Tax data show that Native Authorities' capacity varied within and between colonies, due to both underlying economic inequalities and African elites' relations with the colonial government. Our findings suggest that Africans had a bigger hand in shaping British colonial institutions than often acknowledged.
JEL-codes: N0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
Date: 2020-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr, nep-evo and nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Published in Journal of Economic History, 1, December, 2020, 80(4), pp. 1189 - 1223. ISSN: 0022-0507
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/107519/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: How Africans Shaped British Colonial Institutions: Evidence from Local Taxation (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:107519
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().