 Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trialElla Arensman, Mallorie Leduc, O’Brien, Cliodhna, Paul Corcoran, Eve Griffin, Caleb Leduc, Evelien Coppens, Fotini Tsantila, Victoria Ross, Kahar Abdulla, Pia Hauck, Benedikt L. Amann, Birgit Aust, Arlinda Cerga Pashoja, Johanna Cresswell-Smith, D’Alessandro, Luigia, Naim Fanaj, Birgit A. Greiner, Jeroen Luyten, Sharna Mathieu, Margaret Maxwell, Gentiana Qirjako, Hanna Reich, Sarita Sanches, Monika Ditta Tóth, Joseph Kilroy, Karen Michell, Nicola Reavley, David McDaid and Chantal Van Audenhove LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library Abstract: Background Well-organised and managed workplaces can be a source of wellbeing. The construction, healthcare and information and communication technology sectors are characterised by work-related stressors (e.g. high workloads, tight deadlines) which are associated with poorer mental health and wellbeing. The MENTUPP intervention is a flexibly delivered, multi-level approach to supporting small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in creating mentally healthy workplaces. The online intervention is tailored to each sector and designed to support employees and leaders dealing with mental health difficulties (e.g. stress), clinical level anxiety and depression, and combatting mental health-related stigma. This paper presents the protocol for the cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) of the MENTUPP intervention in eight European countries and Australia. Methods Each intervention country will aim to recruit at least two SMEs in each of the three sectors. The design of the cRCT is based on the experiences of a pilot study and guided by a Theory of Change process that describes how the intervention is assumed to work. SMEs will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control conditions. The aim of the cRCT is to assess whether the MENTUPP intervention is effective in improving mental health and wellbeing (primary outcome) and reducing stigma, depression and suicidal behaviour (secondary outcome) in employees. The study will also involve a process and economic evaluation. Conclusions At present, there is no known multi-level, tailored, flexible and accessible workplace-based intervention for the prevention of non-clinical and clinical symptoms of depression, anxiety and burnout, and the promotion of mental wellbeing. The results of this study will provide a comprehensive overview of the implementation and effectiveness of such an intervention in a variety of contexts, languages and cultures leading to the overall goal of delivering an evidence-based intervention for mental health in the workplace. Keywords: depression; mental health and wellbeing; occupational; organisational interventions; process evaluation; economic evaluation; self-harm; suicidal behaviour; suicide; workplace health promotion; workplace based health interventions; implementation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Trials, 30, September, 2023, 24(1). ISSN: 1745-6215 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:120339 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.