Does securing the commons conserve resources and improve well-being?

Philippe Delacote, Jessica Meyer and Charles Palmer

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Policies to secure property rights extend over hundreds of millions of hectares of land claimed as common property. Well-being and resource outcomes from securing the commons are theoretically shown to vary, conditional on local institutional quality and the extent of resource dependence among policy recipients. A differences-in-differences framework is applied to micro-scale panel data to evaluate the impacts of securing forest commons in Malawi. We find short-term negative effects on food security and non-food expenditures but no impact on forest loss rates. Baseline institutional capacity and households' labour portfolios are empirically shown to condition outcomes, with implications for policy targeting.

JEL-codes: J01 N0 R14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 77 pages
Date: 2026-02-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/137199/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:137199

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().