National surgical, obstetrics, and anaesthesia plans in Sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative economic content analysis

Martilord Ifeanyichi, Phyllis Tenkorang, Pedra Rabiee, Alshaheed Abdelhabeeb, Meskerem Kebede, Maeve Bognini, Ryan Ellis, Rachel Hargest and Rocco Friebel

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The introduction of National Surgical, Obstetrics, and Anaesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) aims to address the region's significant gaps in access to surgical care. The financial implications of these plans, which are crucial for implementation and scaling, remain underexplored. This study presents a comparative analysis of the economic content of NSOAPs across ten SSA countries, highlighting financial strategies, costing, and proposed implementation frameworks. METHODS: A mixed-methods policy content analysis was conducted. Data were collected from published documents, followed by a qualitative thematic analysis of economic components. Quantitative analysis focused on the comparison of total and per capita costs, adjusted for purchasing power parity (i.e., in International dollars [I$]), and aligned against socio-economic indicators. RESULTS: There was significant variability in the economic content covered across the ten NSOAPs. Overall, most plans emphasised resource mobilisation and to a lesser extent financial protection, while purchasing was the most neglected. Nigeria and Tanzania provided the most comprehensive financing strategies, including innovative resource mobilisation, risk protection, and purchasing (at least implicitly); other countries like Rwanda and Madagascar lacked detailed financial protection and purchasing mechanisms. Total lifespan costs ranged from I$221 million (Senegal) to I$50.5 billion (Nigeria), with per capita costs varying widely. Annual costs as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product were modest, but in some countries, like Nigeria, implementation would require nearly 10% of the annual national budget. Involvement of (health) economics specialists and ministry of finance stakeholders was notably low, generally. CONCLUSION: NSOAPs represent an important policy tool for improving surgical care in SSA. However, inadequate economic planning and financing strategies present significant barriers to their implementation. Future plans should be developed through multi-disciplinary expertise and inter-sectoral engagement with a focus extending beyond resource mobilisation to encompass financial protection and purchasing to ensure sustainable investments in surgical care. Unbundling the plans into smaller, contextually prioritised packages may enhance their perceived financial feasibility and, consequently, their appeal to governments and funders.

Keywords: global surgery; health economics; health policy; Sub-Saharan Africa; NSOAP; content analysis; financing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2026-12-31
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in BMC Health Services Research, 31, December, 2026, 26(1). ISSN: 1472-6963

Downloads: (external link)
https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/138902/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:138902

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().