The returns to education: a reply

Gregory Clark and Christian Alexander Abildgaard Nielsen

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: In this response to Lee Crawfurd's comment on The Returns to Education: A Meta-Study, we address his three main criticisms. We contend that estimates based on compulsory schooling laws constitute the most reliable evidence on causal returns to education. We show that our parsimonious approach to correcting for publication bias is preferable to more complex approaches that have biases of their own. Finally, we argue that the observed skewed distribution is most plausibly explained by selective omission of negative estimates. We therefore conclude that the comment does not undermine our central finding that reported returns to education are substantially inflated because of publication bias.

JEL-codes: N0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 4 pages
Date: 2026-08-24
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in KYKLOS, 24, August, 2026. ISSN: 0023-5962

Downloads: (external link)
https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140802/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:140802

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().