Housework, hygiene and health. Public expectations versus private limitations in working-class households in late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century Britain

Sara Horrell and Jane Humphries

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Economic historians often attribute better health and hygiene in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries to improved domestic conditions, enabled by sanitary reform and the education of working-class women in household management. Instruction might have engendered a new esteem for cleanliness and comfort or greater awareness of the mechanisms of disease transmission, but it remains unclear how ordinary women translated the responsibility for their families’ health into improved domestic conditions. We examine the circumstances in which most women toiled to achieve the standards decreed. Despite the much-lauded sanitary reforms of the era, environments were challenging. Increased urbanisation, population growth, and over-crowded accommodation put demands on public provision of the clean water and sanitation essential to alleviate domestic squalor. Housing remained primitive and household budgets inadequate. Mothers laboured to launder their families’ clothes, to keep their children clean, and to create palatable meals with the meanest of resources. But sanitary infrastructure stopped outside working-class homes, water was supplied to external standpipes, and disposed of by hand into street drains, while flush toilets were few and far between forcing reliance on shared and filthy privy middens often located at some distance. Labour-saving appliances were uncommon, and nutritional adequacy hard to achieve on working-class incomes. Reformers thought that poor domestic sanitation, slum housing, overcrowding, and poverty should be remedied by private initiative not public intervention. Women heard the exhortations to protect their families from dearth, dirt, and disease, but it was only by dint of their own toil that they could compensate for the limitations that their circumstances imposed and begin to address the gulf between reality and public expectations.

Keywords: housework; hygiene; health; twentieth century England (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J01 R14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-10-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in History of the Family, 1, October, 2026. ISSN: 1081-602X

Downloads: (external link)
https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140928/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:140928

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().