Testing the NEG model: further evidence from panel data

Bernard Fingleton ()

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Local wage variations in the UK are explained by two non-nested rival hypotheses. The first derives from new economic geography theory, in which wages depend on market potential. The second come from urban economics theory, giving a reduced form with wage rates dependent on employment density. The paper examines whether one of these rivals is encompassed by the other by fitting an artificial nesting model using three alternative panel data estimators. The estimates indicate that neither hypothesis is encompassed by its rival, suggesting a need for new, more comprehensive, theory.

JEL-codes: C1 F3 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2008-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33147/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: TESTING THE NEG MODEL: FURTHER EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA (2009)
Working Paper: Testing the NEG Model: Further Evidence from Panel Data (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:33147

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().