EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The conventional wisdom of discharge arbitration outcomes and remedies: fact or fiction

Mario F. Bognanno, Jonathan E. Booth, Thomas J. Norman, Laura J. Cooper and Stephen F. Befort

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: This study examines some of the arbitration community’s commonly accepted beliefs about arbitration outcomes and remedies in employee discharge cases, with the findings revealing that some beliefs are likely fact, while others, perhaps, are fiction. With data from 1432 Minnesota discharge awards and 74 arbitrators who decided them, eight truisms are examined pertaining to the following: the frequency that arbitrators use Daugherty’s Seven Tests rubric to analyze case evidence and whether its use affects award outcomes; the distribution of varying quanta of required proof by arbitrators and how different quanta affects award outcomes; and the effect of employee job tenure and “last chance agreement” status on award outcomes. Using a subsample of “reinstatement with back pay” awards, we additionally examine the prevalence of arbitrators ordering how back pay should be computed and “retaining jurisdiction” over back pay cases.

JEL-codes: J50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2014, 16(1), pp. 153-185

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65967/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:65967

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager (lseresearchonline@lse.ac.uk).

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:65967