Failure or flexibility? Apprenticeship training in premodern Europe
Patrick Wallis (),
Clare Crowston and
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library
Pre-industrial apprenticeship is often considered more stable than its nineteenth- and twentieth-century counterparts, apparently because of the more durable relationships between masters and apprentices. Nevertheless, recent studies have suggested that many of those who started apprenticeships did not finish them. New evidence about more than 7,000 contracts across several cities in three countries finds that, for a number of reasons, a substantial minority of youths entering apprenticeship contracts failed to complete them. By allowing premature exits, cities and guilds sustained labor markets by lowering the risks of entering long training contracts. Training flexibility was a pragmatic response to labor-market tensions.
JEL-codes: N0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 23, August, 2017, 48(2), pp. 131-158. ISSN: 0022-1953
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/84555/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:84555
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().