New answers to old questions: explaining the slow adoption of ring spinning in Lancashire, 1880-1913
Tim Leunig ()
Economic History Working Papers from London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History
This paper re-examines theories previously advanced to explain Lancashire’s slow adoption of ring spinning. New cost estimates show that although additional transport costs and technical complementarities between certain types of machine reduced ring adoption rates, these supply side constraints were not dominant. Instead what mattered most were demand side factors. Lancashire produced far more fine yarns than other countries and that yarn was better spun on mules. Furthermore, Lancashire had a sizeable export yarn trade, a market again more suited to mule spinning. Low ring adoption rates were a positive response to demand patterns dominated by high quality goods.
JEL-codes: N0 B1 R14 J01 O52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22378/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Working Paper: New answers to old questions: explaining the slow adoption of ring spinning in Lancashire, 1880-1913 (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:wpaper:22378
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economic History Working Papers from London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History LSE, Dept. of Economic History Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager on behalf of EH Dept. ().