 Marriage and the market in eighteenth-century EnglandAnne Laurence
No 15022, Working Papers from Economic History Society Abstract: "My paper touches upon several debates all of which have rather fallen out of sight in the past few years. The first is the debate inspired by Lawrence Stone on the affective family and companionate marriage; the second is the role of dowries and marriage settlements in the making of marriages; and the third is the supposed rise of the love match. In the case of Stone there was a series of furious rebuttals of various kinds then the storm and fury dissipated and everyone just got on with doing more empirical research on marriage and betrothal: I’d particularly mention the work of Diane O’Hara for the late sixteenth century and of Joanne Bailey for the eighteenth century. In the case of dowries, settlements and marriage Lloyd Bonfield and Eileen Spring went at it hammer and tongs in the late ‘80s and Amy Erickson’s book on women and property (1993) saw off a lot of what had, up until then, been speculation. The literature on the supposed love match has spanned a much broader range, taking in writing in cultural studies and English literature and theory. The eighteenth century is often identified as the timing of this change, though the fathers of this discussion (Stone, John Gillis and Alan Macfarlane) differ as to the details. What this paper is concerned with is the evident differences between the financial information available about prospective brides and grooms in eighteenth century England. The amount of money a prospective bride from a prosperous landed, city or mercantile family had was public knowledge as was the amount of money a recently-married woman brought with her, while the only evident worth of a groom was the amount he was prepared to settle on his wife should he predecease her. It may be that negotiations between the bride’s family and the groom about the dowry and dower revealed more to the bride’s family about the groom’s financial standing, but there’s little public evidence of this." JEL-codes: N00 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehs:wpaper:15022 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from Economic History Society Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.