Preferences, actions and voting rules

Alaitz Artabe Echevarria, Annick Laruelle () and Federico Valenciano

IKERLANAK from Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I

Abstract: In this paper we address several issues related to collective dichotomous decision-making by means of quaternary voting rules, i.e., when voters may choose between four actions: voting yes, voting no, abstaining and not turning up - which are aggregated by a voting rule into a dichotomous decision: acceptance or rejection of a proposal. In particular we study the links between the actions and preferences of the actors. We show that quaternary rules (unlike binary rules, where only two actions -yes or no- are possible) leave room for manipulability (i.e., strategic behaviour). Thus a preference profile does not in general determine an action profile. We also deal with the notions of success and decisiveness and their ex ante assessment for quaternary voting rules, and discuss the role of information and coordination in this context.

Date: 2011-01-17
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://addi.ehu.eus/handle/10810/6259 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Preferences, actions and voting rules (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehu:ikerla:6259

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Dpto. de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I, Facultad de CC. Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad del País Vasco, Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre 83, 48015 Bilbao, Spain

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IKERLANAK from Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alcira Macías Redondo ().