A geometric algorithm to solve the NI/G/NI/ND capacitated lot-sizing problem in O(T2) time
Wilco van den Heuvel and
Albert Wagelmans
No EI 2003-24, Econometric Institute Research Papers from Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute
Abstract:
In this paper we consider the capacitated lot-sizing problem (CLSP) with linear costs. It is known that this problem is NP-hard, but there exist special cases that can be solved in polynomial time. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we derive a backward algorithm based on the forward algorithm by Chen et al. (1994), which solves the general CLSP. We give a problem instances that requires exponential running time using the backward algo- rithm. Second, we provide a new O(T2) algorithm for the CLSP with non-increasing setup cost, general holding cost, non-increasing production cost and non-decreasing capacities over time. This is done by adapting the backward algorithm. Numerical tests show the better performance of our algorithm compared to the algorithm proposed by Chung and Lin (1988).
Keywords: capacitated lot-sizing problem; inventory; production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-01-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://repub.eur.nl/pub/18017/feweco20030806162625.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: A Geometric Algorithm to solve the NI/G/NI/ND Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problem in O(T^2) Time (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ems:eureir:18017
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Econometric Institute Research Papers from Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RePub ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).