Family Business Survival and the Role of Boards
Nick Wilson (),
Mike Wright and
Louise Scholes ()
Additional contact information
Nick Wilson: Leeds University Business School
Louise Scholes: Durham University Business School
No 1, Research Papers from Enterprise Research Centre
Abstract:
We explore the vexed question of whether family firms are more likely to survive than non-family firms, focusing on the role of board composition. Utilizing a unique dataset of over 700,000 private family and non-family firms in the UK during 2007-10, we find family firms are significantly less likely to fail than non-family firms. We identify the board characteristics associated with survival/failure in all firms and determine that it is these characteristics that are important in explaining the lower failure probability of family firms. We conclude with an agenda for further research on boards and family firm survival.
Keywords: family business; governance; bankruptcy; board composition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G32 G33 L25 M14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2013-05-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sbm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (49)
Published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, November 2013, pages 1369-1389
Downloads: (external link)
http://enterpriseresearch.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads ... -Family-Survival.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Family Business Survival and the Role of Boards (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:enr:rpaper:0001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Papers from Enterprise Research Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Olivia Garcia ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).